{"id":"W1992331963","doi":"10.1071/wr11106","title":"Choosing cost-effective locations for conservation fences in the local landscape","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Australian Government","keywords":"Exclosure; Fence (mathematics); Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Wildlife; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004275746,0.00006168168,0.0001184614,0.0001625799,0.0002111153,0.00005364445,0.00015781,0.00005931098,0.0001000669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002028359,0.00005694496,0.00003671236,0.0002079371,0.0001213453,0.0003371871,0.00002867758,0.0001610815,0.0004480317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000195664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001628288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007776677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990934,0.00008641972,0.0002518958,0.0001748324,0.00005571093,0.000337748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991273,0.0005800735,0.00006728552,0.000163299,0.00001704242,0.00004500436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023925,0.00008552134,0.9313983,0.00001175717,0.000007699178,7.287175e-8,0.001062607,0.00024245,0.000002167121,0.05805658,0.004817959,0.004304669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004201552,0.00005013233,0.9248492,0.00001059415,0.000001699674,0.000001493676,0.001971134,0.0116745,0.0000121155,0.007021461,0.05389975,0.0000877632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540311,0.001690261,0.02290502,0.008043675,0.0002084012,0.002747528,0.0000515507,0.00001210632,0.01031036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974518,0.0001129813,0.0001876496,0.000622276,0.0001655397,0.001256264,0.00004486823,0.000009275957,0.000149346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05103512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3287901104236605,"score_gpt":0.3606483256875823,"score_spread":0.03185821526392185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}