{"id":"W1992367258","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0050403","title":"Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Subfertility: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Auckland","keywords":"Systematic review; Medicine; Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Meta-analysis; Bioinformatics; Pathology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6295688,0.004360353,0.02374303,0.0678055,0.003438135,0.02150997,0.006302988,0.006312937,0.004969313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.833557,0.004192052,0.04512515,0.06961855,0.01006525,0.01585362,0.01879715,0.005693795,0.0006121805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0278001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02296743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006559326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01191659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.151337,0.5031615,0.2164844,0.01660442,0.1104526,0.001960145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09278359,0.7513929,0.09651825,0.01723442,0.04020242,0.001868537],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005399699,0.0001471051,0.03077741,0.5958794,0.1784206,0.0002362773,0.01270954,0.001401242,0.0005504918,0.007443158,0.003115443,0.1639196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01010112,0.004520082,0.09242093,0.5730594,0.229355,0.001998939,0.01189134,0.006030427,0.001503409,0.03346962,0.03425515,0.001394648],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03023433,0.8808467,0.05249491,0.007536195,0.002333868,0.01880413,0.003064581,0.0003256108,0.004359725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4491321,0.2810884,0.204914,0.004941456,0.001885118,0.05353808,0.003327014,0.0004732558,0.0007005075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4568077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9917956291835026,"score_gpt":0.6461882573730572,"score_spread":0.3456073718104454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}