{"id":"W1992387414","doi":"10.1063/1.4790598","title":"Density functionals for static, dynamical, and strong correlation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Molecular spectroscopy and chirality","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Homogeneous space; Correlation; Computation; Benchmark (surveying); Space (punctuation); Physics; Statistical physics; Work (physics); Spin (aerodynamics); Parameter space; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry; Computer science; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001952577,0.0006124207,0.0007608348,0.0007280227,0.0007562249,0.0007127703,0.001646422,0.0007911952,0.002343433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002411731,0.0001847564,0.0006838034,0.0008428443,0.0007166403,0.001330728,0.001097828,0.00100376,0.0005958453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008144935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001280162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002645871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003380342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999207,0.0003449386,0.00004071751,0.00003700826,0.0003047959,0.00006555965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990128,0.0002914031,0.00004498237,0.0003415908,0.0002577894,0.0000512664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006094738,0.0000794214,0.0005721505,0.0002820466,0.00005708863,0.0002025893,0.0000858629,0.1833696,0.004155651,0.7837271,0.003674271,0.02373335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002710059,0.00004662812,0.0002752743,0.00002969743,0.00001291282,0.00007984015,0.00003231021,0.8836187,0.001975696,0.1105268,0.003345995,0.00002919216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1937696,0.002531534,0.7484311,0.001380926,0.0004336888,0.0002180624,0.0008845461,0.0008250217,0.05152548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156084,0.001031319,0.1713182,0.0005672852,0.0001915475,0.0004425319,0.00111073,0.0004616397,0.009268325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002645871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01032633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0106976160344244,"score_gpt":0.2478342992056229,"score_spread":0.2371366831711985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}