{"id":"W1992389089","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.10.013","title":"General equilibrium effects of a supply side GHG mitigation option under the Clean Development Mechanism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Energy Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Supply side; Mechanism (biology); Greenhouse gas; Clean Development Mechanism; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002479314,0.00102721,0.002694568,0.0009305115,0.0008912006,0.003112239,0.001935037,0.005004397,0.02320013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005995269,0.001140537,0.002014136,0.0008329041,0.002211296,0.003219063,0.001739505,0.002703699,0.0007879385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002449298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002831176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01696997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01154233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991429,0.0003166028,0.00002732546,0.00009393509,0.0000627195,0.0003565107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961708,0.002510079,0.0005113875,0.0001833701,0.0002243512,0.0004000627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001772613,0.0005025711,0.00143435,0.0002054876,0.0002014689,0.0009488605,0.0001080481,0.6248959,0.004738264,0.3547351,0.005023091,0.00543412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303529,0.0004608737,0.003268702,0.00003422769,0.0003058374,0.0001449195,0.0003761858,0.692683,0.00112951,0.2979131,0.002238924,0.0001412521],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8523454,0.0007753812,0.03939423,0.01252542,0.0004604559,0.000198525,0.00170373,0.0004425839,0.09215422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820904,0.0002811189,0.00173541,0.0002932553,0.0001107002,0.00003849091,0.00009956797,0.00003387223,0.01531706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02320013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07761216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01578464428591198,"score_gpt":0.1907946848914441,"score_spread":0.1750100406055321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}