{"id":"W1992389089","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.10.013","title":"General equilibrium effects of a supply side GHG mitigation option under the Clean Development Mechanism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Energy Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Supply side; Mechanism (biology); Greenhouse gas; Clean Development Mechanism; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003622802,0.0001238612,0.0002335846,0.000154658,0.00005841649,0.00003271881,0.0001820966,0.00004260266,0.0001304193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002552187,0.0001154384,0.0001246949,0.00004625809,0.0000482379,0.0001883747,0.0001096539,0.00008111566,0.00009061897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003310403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000405851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003512227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001076827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988296,0.00001462671,0.0007622715,0.0001401917,0.00006496509,0.0001883668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990582,0.00002853894,0.00072325,0.0001477426,0.000003088396,0.00003916873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000194899,0.00170791,0.0170091,0.0006021629,0.0009920212,0.00005988365,0.00156418,0.01816682,0.02022662,0.9242256,0.002249139,0.01300165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003385254,0.0004308405,0.7026744,0.0001345853,0.0001224629,0.00004737612,0.001408745,0.002821712,0.04820635,0.2228801,0.01726997,0.0006182006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928106,0.0004486244,0.003468287,0.0005558136,0.0003350271,0.0002263075,0.00001824414,0.00000384691,0.002133236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996219,0.0003084695,0.002247354,0.0002734873,0.0001705775,0.000010583,0.00001332653,0.00001771245,0.0007394644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7013455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4707443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01578464428591198,"score_gpt":0.1907946848914441,"score_spread":0.1750100406055321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}