{"id":"W1992459694","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0046620","title":"Transcontinental Phylogeography of the Daphnia pulex Species Complex","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Microsoft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Daphnia pulex; Pulex; Biology; Phylogeography; Evolutionary biology; Lineage (genetic); Zoology; Population; Ecology; Phylogenetic tree; Species complex; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Daphnia; Gene; Crustacean","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003837375,0.00006301604,0.00008267328,0.00001578402,0.00005197185,0.00000435618,0.0001401844,0.00005503259,0.000200017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008265041,0.00004933911,0.00008501689,0.0000644566,0.00008589398,0.000001801891,0.00004852613,0.00003758064,0.000003843717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001331486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004842639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005976963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007113319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995609,0.00002621664,0.00008473345,0.00007836259,0.0001314427,0.0001183514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997042,0.000002451136,0.00004628262,0.0001784778,0.00003362393,0.00003499371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001116947,0.0001284771,0.367153,0.00001221314,0.00007239965,1.871676e-8,0.00006862251,0.000001414128,0.63208,0.000101871,0.0003233087,0.00004760283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001590335,0.00002388253,0.6526824,0.000005667675,0.00004512473,5.95451e-7,0.00004947901,0.000001156638,0.3419947,0.00001695339,0.004969838,0.00005119273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960812,0.000229304,0.00002684727,0.000126878,0.00005267907,0.00009463787,0.00006862815,0.000003433425,0.003316374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984378,0.00002451101,0.0006952063,0.0001261033,0.000141049,0.000001271365,0.00006477597,0.000004556503,0.0005047877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2900853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2190046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0474745089373459,"score_gpt":0.2076799822500947,"score_spread":0.1602054733127488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}