{"id":"W1992459694","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0046620","title":"Transcontinental Phylogeography of the Daphnia pulex Species Complex","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Microsoft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Daphnia pulex; Pulex; Biology; Phylogeography; Evolutionary biology; Lineage (genetic); Zoology; Population; Ecology; Phylogenetic tree; Species complex; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Daphnia; Gene; Crustacean","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003848207,0.000199055,0.0002083184,0.001836451,0.0003896416,0.0007418289,0.0002131744,0.0001952012,0.001356136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008137031,0.0001312806,0.00018346,0.001189739,0.0004842689,0.0003585655,0.0008620914,0.0002079315,0.0001707876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003151387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001405322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003609907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005500357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997686,0.00005546815,0.00001642053,0.0001074093,0.00002699507,0.00002503216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995837,0.0001431966,0.0001033965,0.00005416154,0.00006589683,0.00004966783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558447,0.00002492181,0.955014,0.00007644767,0.0002733665,0.0003090157,0.003769134,0.0005100209,0.01891632,0.0004439327,0.000146624,0.02036038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002124798,0.0000140882,0.9982511,0.000008865744,0.00001805701,0.0001389949,0.0004549695,0.0002488027,0.0001947225,0.00005958083,0.0006048041,0.000003909831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988155,0.0002648346,0.000150301,0.00001631146,0.000001447968,0.000003168316,0.00008892514,0.000003882375,0.0006557339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993829,0.0001514829,0.0001484009,0.00001142341,0.000001573808,0.000003784475,0.0001850754,0.000001669536,0.000113786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003609907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00717777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0474745089373459,"score_gpt":0.2076799822500947,"score_spread":0.1602054733127488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}