{"id":"W1992489403","doi":"10.1167/5.10.1","title":"Spatial scaling factors explain eccentricity effects on face ERPs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Foveal; Stimulus (psychology); Eccentricity (behavior); Magnification; Scaling; Psychology; Event-related potential; Face (sociological concept); Cognitive psychology; Communication; Optics; Neuroscience; Physics; Electroencephalography; Geometry; Mathematics; Biology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002483047,0.0003252919,0.0002183859,0.0002640966,0.00007341414,0.0001747695,0.0001848882,0.0001795602,0.001633742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002482244,0.0001966621,0.0001845724,0.0001204652,0.0002219122,0.0003168523,0.0003098341,0.0002964445,0.0003122536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000131736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007278239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002650233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002699683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999071,0.00001487928,0.000009840176,0.00002240198,0.00003002534,0.0000156732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987738,0.0007100916,0.0001830621,0.000212308,0.00007866979,0.00004203284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000280147,0.00003513161,0.005698097,0.00006210554,0.00001722447,0.0001838295,0.00002924381,0.001134468,0.9715873,0.0005137375,0.0001096396,0.02034903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009723492,0.0003969313,0.6288829,0.00002492973,0.000121938,0.001897748,0.00005010621,0.0251642,0.3346791,0.006990696,0.001659739,0.00003450472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816087,0.000735981,0.01397747,0.0001207993,0.00002099914,0.00002555967,0.000105194,0.0002149468,0.00319049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968318,0.0001951398,0.002551316,0.0000321654,0.00001384322,0.000006311325,0.00004462641,0.00004535067,0.0002793476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001633742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005465388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03230394907559354,"score_gpt":0.3149323902562124,"score_spread":0.2826284411806189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}