{"id":"W1992655406","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.08.008","title":"Chemical beam epitaxy growth and optimization of InAs/GaAs quantum dot multilayers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Crystal Growth","topic":"Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Photoluminescence; Quantum dot; Chemical beam epitaxy; Indium; Molecular beam epitaxy; Nucleation; Optoelectronics; Layer (electronics); Materials science; Substrate (aquarium); Luminescence; Epitaxy; Chemistry; Nanotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001018495,0.0001680264,0.0003557462,0.0001135922,0.00004447695,0.00006042425,0.0001698162,0.00006089268,0.0002614864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003160072,0.0001295007,0.0001438725,0.0001124725,0.000101026,0.0005073437,0.00005145108,0.0002163872,0.000001240336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001281079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000437376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002042501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.497377e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988486,0.00002866925,0.0005371433,0.0001335252,0.0002592097,0.0001928961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987737,0.00008898971,0.0005879069,0.00009354435,0.0003010218,0.0001548252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001415029,0.0002430543,0.06488833,0.0001851002,0.0003365865,0.000006129558,0.000997529,0.0009599155,0.9093696,0.02029949,0.001516075,0.001056638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007413344,0.001154638,0.03511348,0.000496431,0.0004572525,0.0002104128,0.00650371,0.01258078,0.8408363,0.09355082,0.0002930945,0.001389705],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963332,0.0002072626,0.002501025,0.0001435077,0.0001674071,0.0001046232,0.00001262302,0.000005930685,0.0005244109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661,0.00002116113,0.002977127,0.00003629739,0.0003219123,0.000002061822,0.000005821461,0.00001808589,0.000007515489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07325134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5280886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00801546349220286,"score_gpt":0.2236821100075448,"score_spread":0.2156666465153419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}