{"id":"W1992698943","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.005","title":"Estimating risk difference from relative association measures in meta-analysis can infrequently pose interpretational challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Relative risk; Pooling; Confidence interval; Meta-analysis; Statistics; Point estimation; Medicine; Odds ratio; Frequency; Interval estimation; Baseline (sea); Absolute risk reduction; Demography; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Computer science; Physics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4728791,0.004618356,0.01315339,0.009480553,0.0020397,0.01029451,0.007167653,0.006811847,0.005551464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8947409,0.003379863,0.01214789,0.007558464,0.006314625,0.01343945,0.008297361,0.01923675,0.001662001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001515369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003097482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009822681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001411228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3618526,0.548538,0.04882469,0.0137957,0.02633626,0.0006527173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06157815,0.8977407,0.0122184,0.0230998,0.004937354,0.0004256326],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007762894,0.0005521967,0.0299274,0.04975224,0.1494893,0.004660991,0.006184342,0.0133259,0.001918871,0.08788108,0.08474839,0.5637964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003683693,0.002114169,0.01184751,0.01135067,0.04007064,0.004770495,0.002011565,0.05017802,0.004567258,0.8241027,0.04448041,0.0008228915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01113375,0.03239474,0.8980494,0.03527077,0.01198611,0.001688972,0.001895059,0.002760347,0.004820877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2979099,0.006721471,0.6605273,0.01878851,0.008127895,0.004264052,0.0008302438,0.001256594,0.001574063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5271209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.650034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.917954279776513,"score_gpt":0.6479797634782578,"score_spread":0.2699745162982552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}