{"id":"W1992703089","doi":"10.1109/ursi-emts.2010.5637027","title":"The effect of gap size on dipole impedance using the induced EMF method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Aalborg Universitet","keywords":"Dipole antenna; Dipole; Antenna (radio); Electrical impedance; Radiation impedance; Input impedance; Radiation pattern; Physics; Loop antenna; Impedance matching; Susceptance; Computational physics; Method of moments (probability theory); Magnetic dipole; Acoustics; Optics; Computer science; Radiation; Mathematics; Coaxial antenna; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004607621,0.00009391258,0.000131325,0.00001111937,0.00019773,0.00003942884,0.0002024913,0.00001898248,0.0001967078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002716354,0.00004191697,0.0001237085,0.0001277258,0.00003732272,0.00001603456,0.0000302569,0.000205641,0.000009295826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002948192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001374606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000601144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001078733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993669,0.0001231673,0.0001188438,0.0001185497,0.0001062199,0.0001662802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983816,0.00115835,0.00007385391,0.0003435515,0.00001840355,0.00002419644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001349611,0.00001402963,0.006232321,0.000002672788,0.00009259331,8.091599e-8,0.00005189239,0.00004027761,0.9387751,0.003715494,0.0001446808,0.05091741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002962805,0.0002910448,0.002851096,0.00001048331,0.0001226224,7.205568e-7,0.00009577208,0.00683667,0.9876939,0.001306105,0.0003753096,0.0001199941],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915616,0.000009128498,0.001736091,0.0003541235,0.00007952235,0.00007325482,0.000001056034,0.000008933702,0.006176329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998037,2.853567e-7,0.0008335852,0.00003158427,0.0001610104,0.000008782878,3.856079e-7,0.000008051165,0.0009192654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05079741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2153812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008329846350875603,"score_gpt":0.3047273009181305,"score_spread":0.2963974545672549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}