{"id":"W1992703089","doi":"10.1109/ursi-emts.2010.5637027","title":"The effect of gap size on dipole impedance using the induced EMF method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Aalborg Universitet","keywords":"Dipole antenna; Dipole; Antenna (radio); Electrical impedance; Radiation impedance; Input impedance; Radiation pattern; Physics; Loop antenna; Impedance matching; Susceptance; Computational physics; Method of moments (probability theory); Magnetic dipole; Acoustics; Optics; Computer science; Radiation; Mathematics; Coaxial antenna; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062137,0.0004262115,0.0003183223,0.0002947547,0.0001153613,0.000635448,0.0004724789,0.0006830263,0.001366784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365119,0.0001973163,0.0002601286,0.0003182962,0.0005245311,0.001322333,0.0006305519,0.0005585481,0.0004594268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002756823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001401796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001615325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001017398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996277,0.0001117196,0.0000118698,0.0000417821,0.0001803325,0.00002653176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976709,0.001715338,0.0001439902,0.0002636591,0.0001639788,0.00004201979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000722067,0.0001866856,0.002927011,0.0004775831,0.00005526571,0.0007314151,0.0006109541,0.2511482,0.5016491,0.08322834,0.002610334,0.1556531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006550696,0.0003585138,0.002398322,0.00004970525,0.0000488433,0.0006822031,0.000168495,0.8098355,0.1609644,0.01712944,0.008250629,0.00004849843],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2485499,0.001108463,0.7323071,0.0005604753,0.0001522861,0.0000458072,0.00008439701,0.001469875,0.01572167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910364,0.0005891337,0.08692305,0.00006871537,0.00002877722,0.00003716793,0.0000740393,0.000238232,0.001677051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001366784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004572392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008329846350875603,"score_gpt":0.3047273009181305,"score_spread":0.2963974545672549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}