{"id":"W1992752766","doi":"10.1049/iet-com.2013.0128","title":"Multi‐objective resource allocation in multiuser orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IET Communications","topic":"Advanced Wireless Network Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing; Computer science; Resource allocation; Division (mathematics); Frequency-division multiplexing; Multiplexing; Telecommunications; Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access; Computer network; Mathematics; Arithmetic","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008760535,0.0005340498,0.0006288802,0.0005165364,0.0003397362,0.0006230292,0.0005970456,0.0005236374,0.0007494239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009724332,0.0002234343,0.0003857943,0.000509807,0.0003160459,0.0006003415,0.0006266706,0.0003878823,0.0001117598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000569941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005341318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001262097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001267623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995098,0.0001946636,0.00001671164,0.00004896708,0.000167506,0.00006236735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997514,0.0001342175,0.00004072206,0.00001462602,0.00004298626,0.00001600537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005396359,0.00005487448,0.0004656567,0.0000608645,0.00005346772,0.00008375288,0.00003872814,0.9398656,0.004256227,0.00693459,0.0003998321,0.04773232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007288628,0.00003549615,0.0001285836,0.000004295221,0.000006357242,0.00002873365,0.000006175816,0.997472,0.0006992636,0.001268823,0.0003390727,0.000003869208],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0672337,0.0008004642,0.9267126,0.0001758266,0.00004269168,0.00005486171,0.0000248722,0.00007872417,0.004876213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8462241,0.0004506313,0.1498107,0.00009773614,0.00003210519,0.0001322169,0.00002871396,0.00002040053,0.003203433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001262097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004633069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01761153776532924,"score_gpt":0.2427919556872143,"score_spread":0.225180417921885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}