{"id":"W1992822641","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.003","title":"Distribution and potential significance of a gull fecal marker in urban coastal and riverine areas of southern Ontario, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Research","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Feces; Indicator bacteria; Stormwater; Environmental science; Fecal coliform; Pollution; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Veterinary medicine; Ecology; Water quality; Surface runoff; Geology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001779225,0.0001608602,0.0002021454,0.001401143,0.001591707,0.0009102369,0.0003815892,0.0001698703,0.0008227535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004902668,0.0001489552,0.000129489,0.002134982,0.0009568813,0.0001622479,0.0003447275,0.0001596444,0.0001072818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006290215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997565,0.00002204092,0.0000102566,0.00004962457,0.00007285218,0.00008880457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.00005052875,0.0001483515,0.00001478823,0.0003315519,0.0001104727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001383614,0.00001671562,0.9853462,0.00003333788,0.00001959156,0.0001775107,0.00252663,0.0001164172,0.005423129,0.0001257626,0.0003547677,0.005721638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001759219,0.00001457485,0.9974573,0.000005522175,0.000005445009,0.00004693562,0.001715874,0.00007219146,0.0001634701,0.000009595191,0.0005042981,0.000003179319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984956,0.0001234787,0.00008531222,0.00003649909,0.000001280433,0.000008348937,0.0003307687,0.000004277494,0.0009143513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986054,0.0001084851,0.0001471509,0.00001524065,9.508804e-7,0.000005170367,0.0002068507,0.000002076654,0.0009086262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03110373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06257373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03178463646925705,"score_gpt":0.2486194391826631,"score_spread":0.216834802713406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}