{"id":"W1992841883","doi":"10.1007/s00267-008-9130-6","title":"Evaluating Local Benefits from Conservation in Nepal’s Annapurna Conservation Area","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Incentive; Business; Protected area; Wildlife conservation; Tourism; Natural resource; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Stewardship (theology); Natural resource economics; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Political science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001344818,0.0003059442,0.0002762053,0.001060571,0.001482204,0.001748474,0.0009056781,0.0008255962,0.003938348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006791444,0.0002220724,0.0003912459,0.001269898,0.0008859577,0.00134294,0.001706691,0.0007008046,0.000224825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002067139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03410518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1236565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987221,0.000651569,0.00004207409,0.00009994136,0.0002472407,0.0002369768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963341,0.001828001,0.00042662,0.000159426,0.0005492304,0.0007026808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003625914,0.005220375,0.8014509,0.000397492,0.0006587869,0.00312979,0.006066156,0.03071535,0.002921466,0.004261863,0.002382769,0.1391692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002382382,0.005311771,0.9193385,0.0002376341,0.0006342194,0.0006496206,0.02907366,0.03545113,0.002819974,0.002786853,0.003386475,0.00007199266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971887,0.00002805589,0.00006134724,0.00007335829,0.000002158657,0.00002926608,0.00005143755,0.000002522563,0.00256307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.0000328814,0.0002113633,0.00001498255,0.000001382347,0.00003457799,0.00004645409,0.000001316359,0.0004359139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03410518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06781334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04230079239765813,"score_gpt":0.2200893039194201,"score_spread":0.177788511521762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}