{"id":"W1992878731","doi":"10.1007/s10958-007-0009-5","title":"A classification of projective homogeneous varieties up to motivic isomorphism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Sciences","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Bielefeld; Ryerson University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Mathematics; Isomorphism (crystallography); Homogeneous; Flag (linear algebra); Projective test; Dimension (graph theory); Pure mathematics; Type (biology); Projective space; Twisted cubic; Complex projective space; Algebra over a field; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008469227,0.0007255044,0.000992286,0.003830751,0.001761121,0.003822377,0.001002057,0.001097702,0.007485801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001522405,0.0005210728,0.0006480656,0.00281717,0.00309901,0.004831828,0.002536097,0.00199421,0.0009741047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009622845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005007514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004287276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002572715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999245,0.0001177425,0.00006916572,0.0001826636,0.0001730757,0.0002122741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985226,0.0004761763,0.000259802,0.0001951402,0.0001874002,0.0003589463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003079557,0.0001566638,0.008531111,0.0001760458,0.00003890588,0.0004975693,0.001264698,0.0007594944,0.007636871,0.9354683,0.006662894,0.03849949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001852625,0.0004788842,0.03122609,0.0001377501,0.0001742172,0.002460144,0.0018103,0.007277724,0.006708842,0.9033195,0.04612442,0.00009685538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9134754,0.001186621,0.03184367,0.001448875,0.0003086855,0.00008208699,0.0008596934,0.0004630312,0.05033191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779794,0.0005852824,0.007105545,0.0001844121,0.000353175,0.00003055748,0.001933117,0.00006896553,0.01175959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007485801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02504253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07322645238339794,"score_gpt":0.3490550191079839,"score_spread":0.275828566724586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}