{"id":"W1992899512","doi":"10.1142/s0219622006001939","title":"ELICITING RATIO PREFERENCES FOR THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS WITH VISUAL INTERFACES: A NEW MODE OF PREFERENCE MEASUREMENT","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Analytic hierarchy process; Preference; Computer science; Class (philosophy); Hierarchy; Mode (computer interface); Process (computing); Visualization; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Machine learning; Statistics; Operations research; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01578471,0.001313974,0.0008876032,0.002472422,0.0004580716,0.003118821,0.00149289,0.001201686,0.005070897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08042757,0.0004027176,0.0006770912,0.002315552,0.00125513,0.004687679,0.002736808,0.001519578,0.001169828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000534129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007901393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000355503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004455587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9742773,0.01721695,0.001066659,0.001255016,0.00588898,0.0002951516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946786,0.04031026,0.00316576,0.00432083,0.004745349,0.0006718383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002473601,0.001140574,0.006274233,0.001828281,0.0002412554,0.0001138373,0.00671698,0.00635324,0.1001738,0.07500484,0.00451884,0.7951605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001980046,0.008542425,0.02648456,0.0009028695,0.0003982023,0.001056712,0.004483974,0.4249992,0.1488561,0.3444901,0.03633786,0.001467984],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02858894,0.000091585,0.9656438,0.0001403262,0.0000736753,0.000749281,0.0001960508,0.0006732577,0.003843047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1387336,0.0001246636,0.8578774,0.0001093277,0.00004862169,0.002147102,0.0001543646,0.0001081414,0.0006967339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01578471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08347851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09765658181990433,"score_gpt":0.418218998527923,"score_spread":0.3205624167080187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}