{"id":"W1993186041","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2014-0344","title":"Wood placement in river restoration: fact, fiction, and future direction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":240,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Habitat; Watershed; Environmental science; Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Restoration ecology; Natural (archaeology); Hydrology (agriculture); Dam removal; Sediment; Debris; Large woody debris; Stream restoration; Geography; Riparian zone; Geology; Archaeology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004081215,0.00004911762,0.00007553132,0.0000583601,0.0002437789,0.00004459651,0.00006300501,0.0000302062,0.0004031044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000255548,0.00003802047,0.000008286111,0.0001502477,0.0004866377,0.0003892919,0.000003410648,0.00006060991,0.000001473675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002588525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005523176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002097146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03479971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995291,0.00002767365,0.0001375167,0.00009038485,0.0001035574,0.0001117223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997503,0.00002586586,0.00006150644,0.00002622097,0.000003850915,0.0001322867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000880252,0.000007337953,0.9710155,0.00000543648,0.000003691148,0.00000723099,0.003803519,0.0002298082,0.00004388639,0.0001155765,0.002129255,0.02262998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003506648,0.0004901393,0.7385558,0.00002665914,0.00001314438,0.00005885925,0.0017073,0.001444464,0.00007767932,0.001725787,0.255417,0.0001324775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918589,0.0002496208,0.000144765,0.003755837,0.0002048328,0.00003014918,4.373019e-7,0.000001280558,0.003754207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992121,0.0001105261,0.0003057862,0.0002263136,0.00005897846,7.782607e-7,3.396428e-7,0.000001199869,0.00008397082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2532877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008752968863245416,"score_gpt":0.1925795336314749,"score_spread":0.1838265647682295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}