{"id":"W1993248159","doi":"10.1139/v09-034","title":"The affinity of HGGG, GHGG, GGHG, and GGGH peptides for copper(II) and the structures of their complexes — An ab initio study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"Crystallography and molecular interactions","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Solvation; Deprotonation; Ab initio; Aqueous solution; Computational chemistry; Implicit solvation; Potentiometric titration; Amide; Peptide; Crystallography; Ionic bonding; Copper; Histidine; Ion; Stereochemistry; Physical chemistry; Amino acid; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002346698,0.0001314344,0.0002585122,0.00003309771,0.0003592926,0.00005802695,0.000271309,0.00006582411,0.00004377831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001752436,0.00008207487,0.00013315,0.00005719555,0.0005094822,0.00006694425,0.00001463213,0.000245486,7.99113e-9],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001911024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002470888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004636109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003281397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992232,0.00002586488,0.000375491,0.0001033844,0.0001070482,0.0001650498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987494,0.0002409217,0.0003408898,0.0002286742,0.00022996,0.000210106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007999056,0.0002131465,0.00520257,0.0002491059,0.0007538862,0.00003133915,0.009355116,0.00004933364,0.9741233,0.0008673892,0.002341428,0.006013508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006849127,0.000716124,0.01612212,0.0003169157,0.0004493587,0.001148163,0.06944874,0.00005855013,0.8724474,0.01871356,0.01323846,0.000491488],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966434,0.001260643,0.000005753318,0.0003561207,0.00002971797,0.000082841,0.0001691561,0.00000259229,0.001449791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999691,0.00006213409,0.00005048111,0.00005488731,0.00008324086,0.000002904882,0.000007023251,0.000008248785,0.00004008876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1016759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3346916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01358087169309092,"score_gpt":0.2455205942436988,"score_spread":0.2319397225506079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}