{"id":"W1993286654","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2014.04.038","title":"Is Central Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Superior to Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Postmenopausal Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","topic":"Bone health and osteoporosis research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Quantitative computed tomography; Postmenopausal women; Meta-analysis; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Fracture (geology); Nuclear medicine; Bone density; Osteoporosis; Internal medicine; Bone mineral; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009020463,0.001854189,0.01597353,0.003228973,0.0004708502,0.002363722,0.002191414,0.002939655,0.003216039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02423215,0.001558881,0.0210239,0.003827272,0.000780053,0.001809387,0.001059593,0.002159207,0.0002645106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001581033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001963135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007340863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02170081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951252,0.001910185,0.001518879,0.0006515962,0.0006627641,0.0001312824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861183,0.01105591,0.001748837,0.0002742048,0.0006646386,0.0001379948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008946905,0.0001021465,0.006559878,0.458881,0.4717767,0.0001625147,0.0001309911,0.0003540491,0.0004554013,0.0001426421,0.0009015597,0.0515863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002582958,0.0005242242,0.005457895,0.02544218,0.9636465,0.0001492885,0.00007537945,0.0002101576,0.000142802,0.0001596826,0.001573589,0.00003528963],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003512995,0.9957266,0.0002322891,0.0001164577,0.0001176722,0.0000703996,0.0001077718,0.000009066914,0.0001068858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1300518,0.86575,0.002063319,0.001187846,0.0002803053,0.0002050245,0.0002478191,0.00001406529,0.0001997683],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04770535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1335496535890044,"score_gpt":0.514045040591906,"score_spread":0.3804953870029016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}