{"id":"W1993293106","doi":"10.1016/s0009-2509(01)00185-3","title":"Kinetics of CO induced degradation of aqueous diethanolamine","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical Engineering Science","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Diethanolamine; Aqueous solution; Chemistry; Formate; Reaction mechanism; Kinetics; Reaction rate constant; Carbon monoxide; Autoclave; Chemical kinetics; Absorption (acoustics); Inorganic chemistry; Physical chemistry; Catalysis; Organic chemistry; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007436286,0.0001092625,0.0001714268,0.0001833586,0.000003176608,0.000006430688,0.0003614268,0.00008483918,0.000004281222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004153075,0.0001119647,0.00003307381,0.0008596018,0.0001760536,0.00008790424,0.00004642151,0.0001314639,0.000001118367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000729847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007905252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002885658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.343773e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,9.141037e-7,0.0002186755,0.0001335378,0.0002444153,0.0002102212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954,0.00004592477,0.00003246058,0.000270154,0.00006490029,0.00004652188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001251621,0.000009440167,0.00007000064,0.00004434239,0.000003425245,0.000001376622,0.00002080981,0.01120166,0.9865729,0.0001948654,0.00000968159,0.001870209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008394157,0.00001995927,0.0004972885,0.00003416363,0.000004020008,0.0000113249,0.00001065728,0.03412121,0.9650483,0.00002214779,0.00004232069,0.0001046331],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928609,0.000170046,0.005777746,0.00001327551,0.0001143385,0.00005869353,0.000002046716,0.0003799532,0.0006230737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996028,0.00002197228,0.003907616,0.00000192359,0.00001460842,0.000004497118,0.000001569344,0.00001419486,0.000005629147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02291954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4565788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01172679591723951,"score_gpt":0.216940979671129,"score_spread":0.2052141837538895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}