{"id":"W1993294485","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.08.007","title":"How research ethics' protections can contribute to public policy: The case of community treatment orders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public policy; Injury prevention; Psychology; Criminology; Public relations; Medical emergency; Medicine; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2171885,0.001622463,0.003085014,0.004098168,0.0391112,0.04237797,0.008711228,0.1251616,0.01326178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2825094,0.003165141,0.003482357,0.003477558,0.1381356,0.04384758,0.02884355,0.06458819,0.001426816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02163958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05757092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02215463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02594994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8006725,0.1480733,0.004351624,0.009817268,0.01402816,0.02305723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5643081,0.3767983,0.01159988,0.02068158,0.01113985,0.01547227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004370433,0.00006622363,0.0004953214,0.00004435609,0.00003719982,0.0008268586,0.008901597,0.0003609271,0.00006484948,0.9811949,0.006081281,0.001882781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000178274,0.00003609949,0.0003732445,0.0002497401,0.00004337524,0.0003751426,0.007005746,0.0007821823,0.0001819288,0.9645952,0.0261072,0.00007184619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.030692,0.001679099,0.02272405,0.7475154,0.001613076,0.0003089982,0.0000697902,0.00006226395,0.1953353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632535,0.0009522444,0.01044207,0.1073323,0.002030123,0.0008169459,0.00003549399,0.00009843743,0.01503888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2171885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2932891577144712,"score_gpt":0.5064363203539156,"score_spread":0.2131471626394444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}