{"id":"W1993715954","doi":"10.1117/12.627688","title":"A canopy reflectance model based topographic normalisation approach for forested terrain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Western Canada Research Grid","keywords":"Terrain; Remote sensing; Canopy; Bidirectional reflectance distribution function; Environmental science; Scale (ratio); Pixel; Vegetation (pathology); Geology; Reflectivity; Computer science; Geography; Cartography; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002258673,0.0004218551,0.0002750535,0.0004547733,0.0002345962,0.0006273261,0.0005785672,0.0002436132,0.001507634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008432375,0.00018775,0.0003544958,0.0007160641,0.0001635299,0.0005097541,0.0003031745,0.0005184038,0.000755537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004824483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009520997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01808706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03332227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998305,0.00001771243,0.000005792246,0.0000406818,0.00008936748,0.00001582996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998061,0.00002358688,0.00002285249,0.00004250322,0.0000973844,0.000007559273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008960824,0.00009333987,0.007696406,0.0001309374,0.00006326023,0.0001366626,0.0001668656,0.3336021,0.06490494,0.006986378,0.00419633,0.5819332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009143326,0.00002772283,0.00436325,0.000006861999,0.0000120399,0.0001502444,0.00005116998,0.9810075,0.007449262,0.00193954,0.004959327,0.00002393041],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04763608,0.000128017,0.9462782,0.00007936016,0.0000484994,0.00005702883,0.0002184346,0.002201955,0.003352442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3636308,0.0002150745,0.6272967,0.00003659543,0.00002500774,0.00006035552,0.0009311202,0.000401221,0.007403053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01808706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03596354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0106488544747812,"score_gpt":0.2178020410915625,"score_spread":0.2071531866167813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}