{"id":"W1993785062","doi":"10.4296/cwrj2803437","title":"Water Conservation and Development Projects in Saskatchewan: An Economic Evaluation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drainage; Flood control; Agriculture; Business; Irrigation; Liberian dollar; Economic impact analysis; Waterlogging (archaeology); Cost–benefit analysis; Environmental planning; Control (management); Irrigation district; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Flood myth; Water resource management; Economics; Geography; Environmental science; Finance; Wetland; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009927608,0.001260031,0.0008376361,0.006375983,0.001658593,0.003250626,0.001420318,0.00116293,0.002853323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01475618,0.0006785622,0.001529168,0.01004755,0.001574051,0.001733784,0.002624159,0.001062115,0.0002594994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04596359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02891561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5039107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6353843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901921,0.00468928,0.0005387699,0.0003026807,0.002943708,0.001333535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833552,0.008406406,0.001304973,0.0007810743,0.005061226,0.001091208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006916783,0.006040786,0.3472157,0.001867084,0.002398589,0.003175436,0.000833997,0.4419163,0.003900995,0.02014451,0.006354498,0.1592353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002287266,0.009181066,0.7212068,0.0006795425,0.001621363,0.0005276302,0.009047567,0.2240203,0.004759969,0.006414746,0.01989268,0.000361093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740242,0.0008426546,0.001166855,0.0004447076,0.00001922886,0.002129663,0.002958683,0.00001984219,0.01839425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868067,0.001802735,0.002894813,0.0001912801,0.00001034694,0.00130665,0.002624124,0.000009539529,0.00435385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4960893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07359581754392026,"score_gpt":0.2045403392912553,"score_spread":0.130944521747335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}