{"id":"W1993807037","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2009.10.007","title":"Rigi—An environment for software reverse engineering, exploration, visualization, and redocumentation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science of Computer Programming","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Reverse engineering; Software engineering; Visualization; Interoperability; Scripting language; Extensibility; Parsing; Software; Process (computing); Programming language; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00384071,0.002432853,0.001932473,0.002224318,0.0008642356,0.003644073,0.005661873,0.001617777,0.03238906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008893183,0.001775331,0.002466921,0.001416869,0.001030014,0.004464763,0.005557167,0.003945358,0.01307408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006067924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001840334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002350403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004033535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974411,0.0006783374,0.0001781418,0.0004119161,0.001092364,0.0001982092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951134,0.002397893,0.0002412336,0.001614477,0.0003728553,0.0002601456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002387337,0.0006854179,0.002593488,0.002411927,0.0005775482,0.0009843857,0.001608721,0.02192651,0.030426,0.06405771,0.3608103,0.5115306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001204341,0.0004151767,0.001986859,0.0005016761,0.0002607562,0.001029795,0.0002554308,0.2743123,0.05893004,0.06858795,0.5920135,0.0005021323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","genre_scores_codex":[0.002592006,0.0004425075,0.5278517,0.0002278498,0.0001510969,0.0002862826,0.003684598,0.4558502,0.008913747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04957659,0.001238313,0.8484036,0.0004965256,0.0001302922,0.001018536,0.01658346,0.06724218,0.01531048],"genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03238906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1083522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01630893437158457,"score_gpt":0.2878898918151171,"score_spread":0.2715809574435326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}