{"id":"W1993839912","doi":"10.1139/x09-039","title":"Evaluation of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for modeling the dominant or codominant height of lodgepole pine trees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Mathematics; Statistics; Logistic regression; Population; Population mean; Logistic function; Ecology; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006461068,0.00007183759,0.0001748429,0.0002019262,0.0002662435,0.00002089524,0.0002572273,0.00005045467,0.0001752997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003978201,0.00004420274,0.00005286665,0.0002344018,0.0002949232,0.0001336079,0.0000236915,0.0001548105,0.000001443455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000244576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002261147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003945991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2040448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984409,0.0002306414,0.0003619877,0.0001209233,0.0005641495,0.0002814089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992367,0.0001329842,0.0001510157,0.0001662003,0.0001587958,0.0001543046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001741997,0.0003541601,0.1533915,0.0001056296,0.0002084241,0.00005911559,0.005473978,0.6403754,0.002090017,0.05022498,0.009817096,0.1361576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001480812,0.0009751148,0.8282711,0.00006310571,0.00006026018,0.00003039585,0.0007021363,0.1337981,0.0004572669,0.03318901,0.0008803649,0.00009236498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961678,0.0004954419,0.001138294,0.001017134,0.00005225697,0.0005563941,0.000005623033,5.936145e-7,0.0005664469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.00006635361,0.000386721,0.00001081261,0.00003466823,0.00001038575,0.000003490715,0.000005483756,0.0001229614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6748796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8104793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1272354210972699,"score_gpt":0.3216672768457329,"score_spread":0.1944318557484629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}