{"id":"W1993871292","doi":"10.1207/s15327752jpa8003_05","title":"A Critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) \"The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques\"","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality Assessment","topic":"Psychological Testing and Assessment","field":"Psychology","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Projective test; Rorschach test; Psychology; Thematic apperception test; Test validity; Psychometrics; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1382249,0.0020578,0.001743731,0.006609291,0.006124438,0.009075975,0.008348401,0.01189212,0.004102395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3092286,0.00127954,0.001343006,0.004535802,0.04240296,0.0105321,0.007957119,0.03525877,0.004591625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01448033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02117085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01861949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03081585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8238557,0.05902626,0.01127332,0.008948182,0.09517325,0.001723353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6660807,0.1972623,0.007274144,0.01121414,0.1134622,0.004706627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006511168,0.00005795385,0.0006366508,0.000839125,0.00004443895,0.0001060801,0.009258222,0.0001852688,0.000253795,0.2535889,0.6560247,0.07893977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006417443,0.00006229972,0.001548918,0.003813131,0.00005342802,0.0004693884,0.003255634,0.0006501346,0.0006197685,0.1823447,0.806994,0.0001243342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001288947,0.01154301,0.02438986,0.9192188,0.02212291,0.0001478154,0.0002436785,0.0002886111,0.02075634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0583666,0.01597753,0.06114898,0.8094689,0.02860333,0.001534365,0.0001782963,0.0004248608,0.02429719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7310119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08013722317294424,"score_gpt":0.4650608866834027,"score_spread":0.3849236635104585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}