{"id":"W1993871292","doi":"10.1207/s15327752jpa8003_05","title":"A Critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) \"The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques\"","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality Assessment","topic":"Psychological Testing and Assessment","field":"Psychology","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Projective test; Rorschach test; Psychology; Thematic apperception test; Test validity; Psychometrics; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006504883,0.0001907941,0.0004930752,0.000182661,0.0001140545,0.0000497926,0.0003576705,0.0001001174,0.0006506263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005444434,0.0001264292,0.0003017497,0.0005058707,0.0004705095,0.0001278567,0.00003793381,0.0007481172,0.000002278206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002581603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00106173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001497614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007655985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960478,0.001342261,0.001033776,0.0003072221,0.0008331566,0.0004357834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967142,0.0006482754,0.001249174,0.0004222799,0.0008112714,0.0001547887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009365364,0.02293371,0.254844,0.0004126354,0.002299201,0.0003285199,0.02725253,0.00006125732,0.1165867,0.3381397,0.2013113,0.03489386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003465944,0.006399306,0.527675,0.0008380972,0.0003116865,0.0006329601,0.02144621,0.00004581613,0.01503936,0.01649856,0.4069265,0.0007205324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881448,0.0008346707,0.01122432,0.006407036,0.001504388,0.0006832016,0.00009391737,0.00003567317,0.09107202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795448,0.00004137796,0.01861276,0.001263556,0.00004034387,0.00002701734,0.000001813457,0.00001417276,0.0004542237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3216411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7123902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08013722317294424,"score_gpt":0.4650608866834027,"score_spread":0.3849236635104585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}