{"id":"W1994134666","doi":"10.1177/1468798406069797","title":"Biliteracy and trilingual practices in the home context: Case studies of Chinese-Canadian children","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Context (archaeology); First language; Mandarin Chinese; Heritage language; Immigration; Minority language; Literacy; Multilingualism; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Home language; Native-language instruction; Reading (process); Psychology; Language proficiency; Pedagogy; Political science; Linguistics; Vocabulary development; Teaching method; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001140329,0.000848734,0.0006725387,0.001808229,0.01790419,0.002022305,0.001632028,0.001157126,0.001787671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002320114,0.0005886795,0.0005910987,0.003647458,0.004322976,0.0007880462,0.002940392,0.001747811,0.0001980852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02852855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02508062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9473181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982709,0.0003638386,0.0000629503,0.0001887424,0.0003622239,0.000751303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998767,0.000313138,0.0001680908,0.00007116562,0.0002912525,0.0003893488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009494594,0.0003772605,0.1119178,0.000242269,0.00003011088,0.02504385,0.8403159,0.0001727672,0.001011435,0.002047318,0.0009241023,0.01782229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001626791,0.0001529806,0.1113641,0.0001577107,0.00006235925,0.00669993,0.8723466,0.0001775576,0.0007263078,0.0002431342,0.007989904,0.00006332085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971414,0.0002614612,0.00005317402,0.0001020272,0.000004500753,0.00003716087,0.00005597751,0.00000232265,0.002341965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963586,0.000959228,0.0003775381,0.0000764659,0.000003069304,0.00004326966,0.00006901335,0.000005837901,0.002106983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2069901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03532321777096779,"score_gpt":0.4302485340842028,"score_spread":0.394925316313235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}