{"id":"W1994134666","doi":"10.1177/1468798406069797","title":"Biliteracy and trilingual practices in the home context: Case studies of Chinese-Canadian children","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Context (archaeology); First language; Mandarin Chinese; Heritage language; Immigration; Minority language; Literacy; Multilingualism; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Home language; Native-language instruction; Reading (process); Psychology; Language proficiency; Pedagogy; Political science; Linguistics; Vocabulary development; Teaching method; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002056675,0.000133472,0.0003168406,0.0004618732,0.0002939593,0.0002337634,0.0002744434,0.00006639919,0.00003837468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003100161,0.00008660559,0.0001044797,0.0005416939,0.0002143933,0.0009576576,0.00001637303,0.0003619775,0.000002180618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005446249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008337375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.169503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06437919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980263,0.0005428322,0.000720599,0.0001300243,0.0003237468,0.0002565185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970278,0.001180384,0.001056393,0.0001500044,0.0004337861,0.0001516742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000214235,0.0002118919,0.4652097,0.000008458557,0.0000433137,0.0001361524,0.5165756,0.000002125851,0.000003700405,0.00082981,0.0001254428,0.01683236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007965709,0.0001472192,0.9714093,0.00007802247,0.00003036525,0.001039122,0.01851272,0.000001581144,0.000002594182,0.002539634,0.005326787,0.0001160681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888851,0.006245295,2.281108e-7,0.003188856,0.0002798864,0.0002257129,0.00001870285,0.00000405573,0.001152177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997593,0.0002675323,0.0001676684,0.0005844951,0.001259502,0.000001822286,0.000001848996,0.000008085005,0.0001160172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5061996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9526935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03532321777096779,"score_gpt":0.4302485340842028,"score_spread":0.394925316313235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}