{"id":"W1994238715","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v5n2p1","title":"An Investigation of the Relationship between L1 Lexical Translation Equivalence and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Vocabulary; Linguistics; Arabic; Word (group theory); Natural language processing; Computer science; Meaning (existential); Dynamic and formal equivalence; Translation (biology); Vocabulary development; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine translation; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008564665,0.00008144164,0.0001282246,0.0001494313,0.00004251884,0.00004090875,0.0002660368,0.0001074167,0.0002282753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01298063,0.00006807889,0.00006055474,0.000108595,0.0001160704,0.000128499,0.0000195053,0.0003151599,0.000002755426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004382742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007814064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000136882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001228587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985886,0.0002793556,0.0004996399,0.0001048947,0.0004415548,0.00008601258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940256,0.000549623,0.0004768339,0.000129866,0.004699461,0.0001186381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002678462,0.00008752027,0.9271047,0.00001621261,0.000142952,0.00002764821,0.02995943,0.0005293816,0.0001385965,0.03711976,0.001656511,0.002949459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001550348,0.0002747718,0.9785246,0.0001322615,0.00009871886,0.00001967882,0.003772655,0.0001865795,0.0003385401,0.01045652,0.004510017,0.0001353628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863645,0.0008115349,0.002131111,0.0001214844,0.006157906,0.00006627688,0.00002164168,0.00001633216,0.004309213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921525,0.000002115905,0.001164426,0.0004116306,0.006197202,8.519767e-7,0.00003086743,0.00001085972,0.00002953883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05141988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08663867889282333,"score_gpt":0.3696718047775729,"score_spread":0.2830331258847496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}