{"id":"W1994238715","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v5n2p1","title":"An Investigation of the Relationship between L1 Lexical Translation Equivalence and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Vocabulary; Linguistics; Arabic; Word (group theory); Natural language processing; Computer science; Meaning (existential); Dynamic and formal equivalence; Translation (biology); Vocabulary development; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine translation; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00141423,0.0002577915,0.0002786663,0.0006099371,0.0003324081,0.0009859937,0.0003606426,0.0004228861,0.005622339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01832436,0.0002354975,0.0002157823,0.0003898959,0.0008940353,0.001253817,0.0008224,0.000955122,0.0006305126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004304658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007009248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002244528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00155335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988545,0.0003673737,0.00008157342,0.0003199466,0.0002807714,0.00009583305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770924,0.01450514,0.005155997,0.0008473162,0.001308154,0.001090936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004342942,0.005435459,0.86415,0.0002925841,0.0001792371,0.0008508178,0.01064264,0.0003811393,0.05437459,0.001754131,0.0002546977,0.05734184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004158507,0.003211916,0.9875848,0.00001910453,0.00004483696,0.0003421037,0.001116142,0.0004377395,0.006077144,0.000648442,0.0004544301,0.00002170454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986227,0.00007708739,0.0001821922,0.00002226703,0.000002428017,0.000008106298,0.0000192936,0.000003748037,0.00106219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990773,0.00005911291,0.0002550335,0.00001873351,0.000003900541,0.00001640175,0.00003728695,0.000005216714,0.0005270661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005622339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01880854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08663867889282333,"score_gpt":0.3696718047775729,"score_spread":0.2830331258847496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}