{"id":"W1994318311","doi":"10.1088/0967-3334/34/9/1027","title":"An experimental clinical evaluation of EIT imaging with ℓ<sub>1</sub>data and image norms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiological Measurement","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Electrical impedance tomography; Outlier; Iterative reconstruction; Robustness (evolution); Image quality; Algorithm; Image resolution; Regularization (linguistics); Hyperparameter; Computer science; Norm (philosophy); Tomography; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003229806,0.0007325142,0.0006375588,0.0006319712,0.0002643316,0.0008687733,0.000715015,0.001493213,0.002024825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01338051,0.0003600142,0.0003243511,0.0004836075,0.001548771,0.0007744587,0.001080731,0.0007949349,0.0004642002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003722903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000378644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005158925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004706422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984681,0.0007258078,0.0001095749,0.0002553098,0.0003739856,0.00006715182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944478,0.003721224,0.000386353,0.0004876367,0.0007908397,0.0001661845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01162961,0.003522468,0.01568569,0.002646814,0.0002778927,0.002456865,0.001406034,0.1952874,0.4509598,0.00675599,0.005298972,0.3040724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008907305,0.0222122,0.02007744,0.0002833445,0.0002934057,0.006474284,0.0008504457,0.5945653,0.3388153,0.004797537,0.01052016,0.0002197944],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474062,0.002101513,0.2426777,0.001360619,0.0002955469,0.0006127303,0.0007085982,0.0007256516,0.004111557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870978,0.0009092304,0.1083226,0.0004250259,0.00008102885,0.0004402951,0.0006989238,0.0001673402,0.001857868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003229806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01708108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1035473431327362,"score_gpt":0.3171026780766911,"score_spread":0.2135553349439549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}