{"id":"W1994411146","doi":"10.1115/ipc2012-90259","title":"Enbridge Cost and Schedule Contingency Assessments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada; Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cost contingency; Contingency; Schedule; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Contingency plan; Valuation (finance); Guard (computer science); Process (computing); Cost estimate; Business; Engineering; Cost engineering; Systems engineering; Finance; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639156,0.00006806846,0.00009905137,0.0001444236,0.0001299776,0.0001867431,0.0001691002,0.00002414513,0.003060043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001810273,0.00004787654,0.00002498652,0.0003110589,0.00005077149,0.0009524082,0.0001466895,0.00005567298,0.000639069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008369399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000120517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001213619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008687005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989073,0.00004028271,0.0002391029,0.000163397,0.0004326334,0.0002172376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994059,0.0001389147,0.0000799661,0.0002095359,0.0000737866,0.00009193284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003570508,0.00001486032,0.6843554,0.000001386071,0.000005276481,1.348893e-7,0.00006112137,1.898487e-7,0.00005562516,0.01972101,0.00803081,0.2877506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000323986,0.00001977322,0.3701333,0.000002924825,0.000007345146,0.000007895857,0.0006675358,0.00129159,0.0005123593,0.000938464,0.625962,0.0001328239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6760157,0.0001205412,0.007259635,0.0002458472,0.0007439058,0.0001579871,0.000001629179,0.00003838328,0.3154164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762896,0.00002355375,0.002402621,0.0002291251,0.0001007385,0.00000844362,9.09068e-7,0.000003004734,0.02094196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6179311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1934707602717256,"score_gpt":0.4579564568247091,"score_spread":0.2644856965529835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}