{"id":"W1994411146","doi":"10.1115/ipc2012-90259","title":"Enbridge Cost and Schedule Contingency Assessments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada; Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cost contingency; Contingency; Schedule; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Contingency plan; Valuation (finance); Guard (computer science); Process (computing); Cost estimate; Business; Engineering; Cost engineering; Systems engineering; Finance; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00874164,0.001090719,0.0006359369,0.00576693,0.001416957,0.004067098,0.002268854,0.001117707,0.02587391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03425887,0.0007557872,0.0006307331,0.002894271,0.0006357091,0.003938768,0.002471152,0.001465042,0.006433596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003679767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004526799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01980884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02991635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916809,0.002050488,0.0004710229,0.000491222,0.00500931,0.0002970522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858456,0.00341815,0.0008360667,0.002316379,0.007395614,0.0001881988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002050985,0.0001771167,0.007216233,0.0002350144,0.00002512367,0.000285856,0.00135543,0.1698521,0.002647512,0.1548522,0.09016924,0.572979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000502778,0.0002553281,0.01151454,0.0003343787,0.00002996841,0.0003510418,0.001217613,0.4507783,0.007853981,0.07358085,0.4537896,0.0002441482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04252996,0.0004379661,0.5774335,0.001797933,0.0003066923,0.001721528,0.006316677,0.005448584,0.3640072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3222049,0.0007492283,0.5255797,0.0002867306,0.0001266197,0.0009942646,0.008380325,0.00145563,0.1402225],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02587391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08655691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1934707602717256,"score_gpt":0.4579564568247091,"score_spread":0.2644856965529835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}