{"id":"W1994474201","doi":"10.1016/j.patrec.2014.10.016","title":"Recognizing affect in human touch of a robot","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pattern Recognition Letters","topic":"Emotion and Mood Recognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Arousal; Closeness; Valence (chemistry); Robot; Gesture; Computer science; Feeling; Human–computer interaction; Classifier (UML); Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Social psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004665289,0.0001863114,0.0002834625,0.0004264115,0.00005568586,0.00001945294,0.0001235759,0.0001300408,0.003076815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005539262,0.0002028324,0.0001292265,0.0002352044,0.00006372038,0.0001175329,0.00002430275,0.00025766,0.0008893054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003798422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004575596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002792142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001510495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981586,0.0004583066,0.0004866087,0.0003919697,0.0001698543,0.0003346972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992422,0.0001692075,0.0002274826,0.0002288207,0.0000588427,0.00007342281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005314825,0.0004271042,0.04920409,0.0001340763,0.00007238399,0.00002180358,0.001685278,0.000007415355,0.110729,0.00003610475,0.003225439,0.8344042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01502867,0.001192923,0.8874684,0.002060033,0.0002353295,0.0001736144,0.001607314,0.0003767596,0.08424035,0.003193184,0.002287515,0.002135888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.963494,0.000009644633,0.01818175,0.0009984039,0.0007565465,0.0003387008,0.0000203047,0.00009033952,0.01611032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946917,0.000004125872,0.0003112782,0.004322314,0.000242588,0.00009478579,0.000214459,0.00003671964,0.00008207725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8382643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05264021762190655,"score_gpt":0.3163233185447631,"score_spread":0.2636831009228565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}