{"id":"W1994595485","doi":"10.1002/cjas.27","title":"Assessing credit quality from the equity market: can a structural approach forecast credit ratings?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Royal Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Econometrics; Statistic; Predictability; Credit risk; Economics; Credit rating; Debt; Actuarial science; Sample (material); Financial economics; Finance; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009291152,0.0002743544,0.0004726221,0.0004220062,0.003186903,0.001549577,0.001294913,0.0001584607,0.0002545718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002972092,0.000241536,0.0002043606,0.001523963,0.004747331,0.001535844,0.00003035896,0.000423229,0.000002835559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001214968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005239624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04815925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6686446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965764,0.0001281682,0.001418706,0.0005864756,0.000187845,0.001102395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961023,0.0006091138,0.001590993,0.0002673775,0.0003226702,0.001107543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006383129,0.00005358896,0.5952836,0.00004297131,0.00006325096,0.0001762001,0.03207883,0.0006073226,0.0002051845,0.3622971,0.001160034,0.007968058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002780691,0.0009407111,0.8760852,0.00008596507,0.00002194215,0.0004061551,0.02303024,0.003787719,0.0001919261,0.09286958,0.001877185,0.0004252902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499633,0.0005636641,0.014697,0.001515203,0.001186489,0.000226893,0.0004790062,0.000008988765,0.03135943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854659,0.000009310947,0.01317808,0.0001346796,0.001031838,0.000005007625,0.0000198986,0.00001162754,0.0001436036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6204854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.232187570803523,"score_gpt":0.3649199078959391,"score_spread":0.1327323370924161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}