{"id":"W1994602698","doi":"10.1177/1078087410390304","title":"Revisiting the Politics of Class in Urban Development: Evidence from the Study of the Social Dynamics of Economic Performance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Affairs Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Social class; Class (philosophy); Creative class; Inequality; Sociology; Social change; Social inequality; Social dynamics; Political economy; Sustainable development; Empirical evidence; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Creativity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517673,0.0001244414,0.000392663,0.00001270487,0.0005499069,0.0000192915,0.001056085,0.00007531113,0.00005458378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004809232,0.00006482354,0.0001373258,0.0003625375,0.0005407811,0.0001293317,0.0001571092,0.0003213407,0.000004411555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001472034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002077584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01554698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998145,0.0004408836,0.0006786676,0.0001574133,0.0003563569,0.0002216362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984789,0.0004484594,0.0006369616,0.0002905614,0.0001179163,0.00002716566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001034623,0.0001253001,0.6766489,0.0009576524,0.0001055472,3.821025e-7,0.2118254,0.000009920471,0.00004608033,0.05851497,0.001058245,0.05069726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005776178,0.00007694298,0.7474577,0.009078351,0.0004068142,9.206676e-7,0.207643,0.000969077,0.00006036197,0.001144145,0.03201464,0.0005703669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851081,0.007717701,6.744398e-7,0.003331394,0.0002618258,0.0008339392,0.00001591842,0.000007887234,0.002722519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954591,0.003888075,0.0000267267,0.00007746629,0.0002812047,0.00001953767,0.000002736735,0.000007729922,0.0002373764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07080889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.867558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03048432069724022,"score_gpt":0.2991389086470915,"score_spread":0.2686545879498513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}