{"id":"W1994619915","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008","title":"Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":620,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Emily Carr University of Art and Design; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Default mode network; Cognitive psychology; Creativity; Generative grammar; Prefrontal cortex; Insula; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Mind-wandering; Neuroscience; Cognition; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001677356,0.0001019576,0.0001156768,0.00005033547,0.0001498556,0.00001417227,0.0001658329,0.00002401964,0.0004997744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001630589,0.00006937989,0.00002545554,0.000211349,0.0004845589,0.00012788,0.00004027792,0.0001263339,0.00001546212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006694178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002857518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003210692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005960991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990357,0.0002741152,0.0001184342,0.0002863128,0.0001430012,0.0001425085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993662,0.000139564,0.000111102,0.00024674,0.00009639427,0.00004000453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006238032,0.001438849,0.06841893,0.00008224468,0.00008095481,0.00004452523,0.4054121,0.0000202758,0.4885307,0.02895714,0.001496705,0.00489381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003751189,0.0001906388,0.7759059,0.000009546296,0.00002327274,0.00003560356,0.008773035,0.0001547536,0.2135442,0.000758715,0.0001148534,0.0001143597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315854,0.00005712499,0.0001035493,0.0002207118,0.0001940667,0.0002422483,0.00001431981,0.00002057198,0.06756195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943474,0.00001492636,0.0001315918,0.000192556,0.00003258817,0.00005555499,4.173571e-7,0.000009915861,0.005215082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.707487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08967545794106824,"score_gpt":0.3873593409570923,"score_spread":0.2976838830160241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}