{"id":"W1994833630","doi":"10.4319/lo.2010.55.4.1590","title":"Evaluating the effect of wind‐driven patchiness on trophic interactions between zooplankton and phytoplankton","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography","topic":"Marine and coastal ecosystems","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Zooplankton; Environmental science; Trophic level; Phytoplankton; Plankton; Transect; Chlorophyll a; Bay; Ecology; Wind speed; Oceanography; Atmospheric sciences; Biology; Physics; Geology; Nutrient","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000338725,0.0002571726,0.000200478,0.0001686425,0.0002750464,0.0003683747,0.0003601558,0.0003007433,0.0004405433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001578492,0.0002209488,0.0002780114,0.0001946447,0.0002816973,0.0003029546,0.0002433829,0.0001545534,0.00004675445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001299428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004970678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09347759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1993635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998816,0.0000306389,0.00001048466,0.00003689537,0.00001900775,0.00002139619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999112,0.0004439864,0.0001856177,0.00005972851,0.00008069307,0.0001180282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002685822,0.00009177437,0.9285726,0.00005143247,0.0002781906,0.0001773961,0.0001221098,0.03891637,0.02787429,0.0001059099,0.00006604866,0.003475269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001954978,0.000181512,0.9536865,0.000003004551,0.00006558954,0.0000388167,0.0000944775,0.04443988,0.001309419,0.00006931151,0.00008079401,0.00001107289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998333,0.00001051297,0.00007424044,0.000003581903,3.377281e-7,0.000001290405,0.00002647776,0.000001224754,0.00004892877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978,0.00001169277,0.0001173658,0.000003531432,4.597103e-7,0.000001868125,0.00004884914,0.000001183123,0.00003498192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09347759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.185867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01306155627635249,"score_gpt":0.2618479736518691,"score_spread":0.2487864173755166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}