{"id":"W1994859985","doi":"10.1142/s1464333208002944","title":"CHARACTERIZING PROJECT AND STRATEGIC APPROACHES TO REGIONAL CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT IN CANADA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Typology; Management science; Function (biology); Scale (ratio); Strategic environmental assessment; Process management; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Engineering; Geography; Environmental impact assessment; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01181961,0.0005120965,0.00045272,0.004617043,0.009264432,0.00885913,0.002720292,0.001277836,0.003017231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01852953,0.0004984926,0.0007006006,0.009271014,0.006462289,0.002216361,0.005931603,0.00152341,0.0001954817],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1319926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.235982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852123,0.004304525,0.0004273013,0.001052146,0.00608048,0.002923265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987817,0.00308741,0.0005217742,0.0006965045,0.006705781,0.001171532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001829256,0.000170653,0.06891875,0.0005372772,0.0002291942,0.001142935,0.03228284,0.06274896,0.002354873,0.5576944,0.01217276,0.2615644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008831817,0.0005082777,0.2291882,0.0009490876,0.0004275052,0.0008152745,0.1463724,0.09785374,0.005613971,0.1605282,0.3571081,0.0005470827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5274194,0.003834639,0.06498349,0.01164645,0.00008837339,0.001367017,0.00124367,0.0004607548,0.3889562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959421,0.001122716,0.02450587,0.0003464933,0.000006219534,0.0002284757,0.0002196831,0.00005087511,0.01409871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8680074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06725961969883804,"score_gpt":0.2943189247844272,"score_spread":0.2270593050855892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}