{"id":"W1994977197","doi":"10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00482-6","title":"Post infarction ventricular septal defect – can we do better?✩","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","topic":"Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair","field":"Medicine","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cardiogenic shock; Cardiology; Myocardial infarction; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Odds ratio; Surgery; Retrospective cohort study; Shock (circulatory); Proportional hazards model","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009708067,0.0002973004,0.0006123751,0.0004162355,0.0003204039,0.0008986394,0.0003486249,0.001411458,0.002141583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005841065,0.0001368497,0.0003240909,0.0003682565,0.0004252628,0.001714431,0.0002445516,0.0009531942,0.0007268583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001095054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003651595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000611969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001379254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997512,0.00008748486,0.00003089703,0.00003618835,0.00004196617,0.00005231528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985231,0.0003438413,0.0005984833,0.00003392395,0.0001476502,0.0003530644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004482706,0.0001882214,0.9284341,0.0001425337,0.0001118875,0.0007767556,0.0001868932,0.00008131158,0.0001255724,0.0001088173,0.003835141,0.0655605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001157506,0.001301043,0.9829489,0.000933158,0.0002201786,0.004815372,0.002762418,0.0006094023,0.0000989709,0.0009567168,0.00519897,0.00003907015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394115,0.03325754,0.0002065348,0.02369428,0.0007006033,0.0000236646,0.0002523156,0.00002157633,0.002432148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830233,0.01211774,0.0003326812,0.001877324,0.001593908,0.00001968444,0.0004163549,0.000005177982,0.0006136838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002141583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007164359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01040575311901833,"score_gpt":0.2387635456861492,"score_spread":0.2283577925671309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}