{"id":"W1995015248","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2013.818302","title":"Understanding contemporary networks of environmental and social change: complex assemblages within Canada’s ‘food movement’","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Politics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Scope (computer science); Food systems; Function (biology); Politics; Social network analysis; Identity (music); Environmental movement; Environmental sociology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Food security; Geography; Social science; Social capital","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002554228,0.0003456394,0.000414314,0.005405213,0.01853796,0.01345436,0.001879392,0.001339003,0.003879237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005651375,0.0003894369,0.0002634688,0.007200282,0.02186286,0.008053207,0.006747399,0.001287684,0.0001998488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0559229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03089903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9021919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9496093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974522,0.0009368975,0.00006374664,0.0003573342,0.0005605076,0.0006293372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966859,0.001426653,0.000530315,0.000205973,0.0005493175,0.0006019315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003582727,0.00002483847,0.03833602,0.0001476032,0.00002435605,0.0009141842,0.7720831,0.001402426,0.0006798073,0.13941,0.002907336,0.04403443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005290009,0.00001611016,0.06245514,0.0002187528,0.00001984776,0.0002775656,0.8019884,0.002238174,0.0001530246,0.02411255,0.1084801,0.00003505465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441624,0.003063456,0.00860908,0.01326767,0.00007512367,0.000164345,0.0003246737,0.00006297966,0.1302703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930917,0.0009181053,0.002085215,0.0001511479,0.000008643417,0.00003760094,0.00009256728,0.00001604513,0.003598887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.405751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06626124858318551,"score_gpt":0.1836386753963756,"score_spread":0.1173774268131901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}