{"id":"W1995059863","doi":"10.1108/ecam-03-2014-0039","title":"Contingency modelling for construction projects using fuzzy-set theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Construction & Architectural Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Originality; Contingency theory; Novelty; Computer science; Contingency management; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Management science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001118458,0.0006427887,0.0006216789,0.001333628,0.00066252,0.001535736,0.001237463,0.0008134983,0.002550633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001984171,0.0003245828,0.001144684,0.0009083538,0.0005917887,0.001035929,0.0006564476,0.0009133801,0.0002450256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001665787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001540412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01619129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01172072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993787,0.0002236896,0.00003699291,0.00007494671,0.0002312404,0.00005437611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992932,0.0004114139,0.0001025603,0.00003133238,0.0001281264,0.00003331324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001329974,0.00001493778,0.0006674778,0.00002947408,0.00001768248,0.00005831512,0.00007313558,0.9755948,0.0002994472,0.01364096,0.0002666513,0.009323806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001823283,0.00001111838,0.0001781175,0.00001425878,0.000005949415,0.0000175786,0.00002247407,0.9939126,0.00009570065,0.005233936,0.0004998077,0.000006478077],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02140838,0.0002975512,0.9719056,0.0001597384,0.00002926528,0.00007847884,0.00009973846,0.0001127497,0.005908475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8420671,0.000592935,0.152712,0.00004299799,0.00003823365,0.0002719395,0.0001854763,0.00002948078,0.004059865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01619129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03219408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1569074929279649,"score_gpt":0.3359617105202881,"score_spread":0.1790542175923232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}