{"id":"W1995084187","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2007.10.001","title":"Revitalized? An event study of forest policy reform in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Forestry; Economics; Political science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001850823,0.0001583394,0.0004871691,0.001085897,0.008957447,0.003757719,0.001909149,0.001700999,0.005479023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008057791,0.0002900641,0.0001482002,0.004013835,0.002186045,0.001285018,0.002076334,0.003651595,0.0003536912],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05015238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04103305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980463,0.0004220377,0.00005625173,0.0001397092,0.0002736025,0.001062053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916016,0.001901191,0.001044487,0.0004518405,0.002262424,0.002738412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002500067,0.003635617,0.6794003,0.0002030558,0.0001932891,0.002389306,0.1108309,0.003791647,0.001279118,0.02452522,0.07520814,0.09604334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007328377,0.00009500453,0.8529938,0.00008860413,0.00003497856,0.00005060224,0.1165576,0.001422931,0.0001797849,0.000803925,0.02765309,0.00004639459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877588,0.0002179518,0.00004173317,0.002638709,0.00001401979,0.00004360621,0.0004781978,0.000004491066,0.008802458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896528,0.0002964039,0.00006388532,0.0005340382,0.00001103664,0.00004491307,0.0004432774,0.000006319178,0.008947228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3638827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01009543188080157,"score_gpt":0.2524415450959936,"score_spread":0.2423461132151921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}