{"id":"W1995112760","doi":"10.1115/ipc2006-10539","title":"Finite Element Analyses of Circumferential Cracks in Thin-Walled Cylinders: T-Stress Solutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 2: Integrity Management; Poster Session; Student Paper Competition","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cylinder; Finite element method; Stress (linguistics); Materials science; RADIUS; Tension (geology); Structural engineering; Constraint (computer-aided design); Bending; Fracture (geology); Composite material; Compression (physics); Geometry; Mathematics; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002912812,0.0003604296,0.0004216282,0.0004888954,0.0001370672,0.0001222791,0.0004229146,0.0001681988,0.0008991782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000114338,0.0003470854,0.000195193,0.0004353291,0.00004635823,0.0004462368,0.0002194342,0.0005028455,0.00006879566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001982353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001346161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003821378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001322426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974943,0.0001411834,0.0008513774,0.0004021564,0.0006365117,0.0004744504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991301,0.00006068759,0.000148528,0.0004759944,0.0001192673,0.00006546243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005542682,0.01450645,0.174918,0.006517135,0.004654841,0.0005033897,0.008591055,0.5610344,0.09902296,0.08567047,0.02232699,0.02170009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01061254,0.0006180733,0.7657001,0.004744385,0.001390626,0.00001184791,0.01199655,0.1551569,0.01818712,0.007992794,0.02035218,0.003236928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4344906,0.001765241,0.4783531,0.001330262,0.004032723,0.002822678,0.0003548396,0.0009644615,0.07588612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978085,0.0002129429,0.0007707516,0.0001120461,0.0001225917,0.00007938792,0.0004341892,0.00003887745,0.0004207163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5907821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02523296839708606,"score_gpt":0.2750327015532754,"score_spread":0.2497997331561893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}