{"id":"W1995136789","doi":"10.1080/03632415.2012.666473","title":"Benefits and Risks of Adopting the Global Code of Practice for Recreational Fisheries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries law; Recreation; Fisheries management; Fishing; Business; Recreational fishing; Legislation; Fishery; Sustainability; Fish stock; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Political science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002833782,0.00006046728,0.00009681418,0.000004116353,0.0001650141,0.000006503588,0.00007747693,0.00003123752,0.0002066575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004921765,0.00004497329,0.0000200855,0.00006300872,0.0004035212,0.0003825869,0.0001675406,0.00002743972,0.000002372636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000174489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002848783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001282788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006613344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995394,0.00002802289,0.0001290525,0.00008128591,0.00009181307,0.000130454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994432,0.0003114387,0.0001310455,0.00008149099,0.0000160524,0.0000168158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005240679,0.00004447441,0.9726284,0.00001967412,0.00004096124,3.85403e-8,0.0008680306,0.000036486,0.000003876173,0.003747415,0.01921972,0.003338487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001135568,0.00006827541,0.8992119,0.000006527736,0.00004791272,0.000001587644,0.001354034,0.000009312488,0.00008276874,0.0004013735,0.09865662,0.0000461434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348317,0.00037638,0.0002569656,0.005741139,0.0001734679,0.0003378656,0.00009530623,0.00001627209,0.05817094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916958,0.0002032695,0.007413481,0.0003792488,0.00003063075,0.00004783393,0.000005538616,0.000003821201,0.0002203835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07943691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2262755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05907626332385604,"score_gpt":0.294020862593372,"score_spread":0.234944599269516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}