{"id":"W1995140825","doi":"10.1097/00008483-200411000-00006","title":"Referral Rate and Outcomes of Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Catheterization in a Large Canadian City","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","topic":"Cardiac Health and Mental Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cardiac catheterization; Hazard ratio; Coronary artery disease; Referral; Ejection fraction; Disease registry; Confidence interval; Internal medicine; Rehabilitation; Revascularization; Proportional hazards model; Cardiology; Emergency medicine; Myocardial infarction; Disease; Physical therapy; Heart failure","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005739374,0.000317043,0.0003589239,0.00120838,0.003293704,0.001162747,0.001131634,0.0006792374,0.001619429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002343209,0.0002871805,0.0005138943,0.002500807,0.0008621743,0.0002971771,0.001037547,0.0008980625,0.0001623181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01563767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01850786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988583,0.00009527282,0.00004490936,0.0002105238,0.0003580204,0.0004329153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978606,0.0001210312,0.0005971909,0.00007806539,0.0006005843,0.0007425288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005534326,0.00005200208,0.9965248,0.00001330193,0.00003014366,0.00009924179,0.0003601634,0.00009984861,0.0001405546,0.00003939991,0.000671887,0.001913263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007230735,0.00002923559,0.9985789,0.000014413,0.00001549887,0.00008269332,0.0007324876,0.0002366438,0.00002720528,0.00001325683,0.0002514725,0.00001101205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981353,0.0001632149,0.00005709157,0.0002303785,0.000007428026,0.00002038662,0.000731047,0.000007139485,0.0006480425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989625,0.0001154768,0.00006180909,0.00008195679,0.000006275709,0.000007910786,0.00057259,0.000002637694,0.0001888134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03125131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1134598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009608583176571154,"score_gpt":0.2930850102261859,"score_spread":0.2834764270496148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}