{"id":"W1995155893","doi":"10.1063/1.2749505","title":"Static and dynamic second hyperpolarizability calculated by time-dependent density functional cubic response theory with local contribution and natural bond orbital analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Nonlinear Optical Materials Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences","funders":"Division of Chemistry; University at Buffalo; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hyperpolarizability; Natural bond orbital; Density functional theory; Functional theory; Computational chemistry; Physics; Chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Molecule","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004068045,0.0004244836,0.0004769501,0.0004473818,0.0003633158,0.0002758676,0.0008478122,0.0006482682,0.002371393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006806085,0.0001923536,0.0005315588,0.0005538714,0.0005327808,0.0005964058,0.0003849499,0.0007543532,0.0003478057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005263787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007730548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004436536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003736872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998653,0.00003827029,0.000003302071,0.00001198547,0.00005792357,0.00002318516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996976,0.0001322202,0.00002148809,0.00003932462,0.00008728525,0.00002221106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002100885,0.0001170347,0.001587716,0.000427659,0.00005828147,0.0003849851,0.0002969755,0.8526835,0.04916248,0.07355139,0.001715784,0.01980416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006645296,0.00001185205,0.00009743842,0.000002598122,0.000002005452,0.00001726778,0.00001355653,0.9963,0.001610463,0.00174773,0.0001856382,0.000004816392],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6210441,0.0005145482,0.3528219,0.0005472859,0.00009224627,0.0001374549,0.000368767,0.000768409,0.02370525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548269,0.0002506796,0.0410446,0.00008204161,0.00001562644,0.0001592567,0.0002390314,0.0001307955,0.003251207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004436536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008821428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003840603182913769,"score_gpt":0.2385004091588457,"score_spread":0.2346598059759319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}