{"id":"W1995181402","doi":"10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.07.002","title":"Contextualizing human security: A ‘deprivation–vulnerability’ approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Human security; Operationalization; Vulnerability (computing); Harm; Expansive; Critical security studies; Security studies; Human development (humanity); Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer security; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law; Network security policy; Security service; Epistemology; Information security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004276925,0.0006654641,0.0005455478,0.004350483,0.003282836,0.005587084,0.001053733,0.001349417,0.003036338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005526161,0.0002774651,0.0004971481,0.002024826,0.02852339,0.00696941,0.01161777,0.002758475,0.0001793836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007022381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004121584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006249072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006997935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960392,0.002831634,0.0001258924,0.0002649991,0.0003523497,0.0003860182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966561,0.001786331,0.000476398,0.000354934,0.0003962509,0.0003299512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001804212,0.00002167451,0.003637159,0.0001821472,0.00003064222,0.0002320184,0.01024297,0.00284473,0.0002870726,0.9709805,0.0008197941,0.01070338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000590845,0.00003507436,0.004042835,0.0003687288,0.00002173735,0.0002559797,0.02289333,0.002115605,0.0002513962,0.9432403,0.02674082,0.00002819379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2105253,0.0108668,0.3112662,0.08235636,0.0005661163,0.0004055533,0.0004359033,0.00009401666,0.3834837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901028,0.001490905,0.00679812,0.0005659978,0.00006873509,0.00006775979,0.0000297294,0.000008867536,0.0008671319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007022381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05095118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07277011939852521,"score_gpt":0.3721142051943128,"score_spread":0.2993440857957876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}