{"id":"W1995181402","doi":"10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.07.002","title":"Contextualizing human security: A ‘deprivation–vulnerability’ approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Human security; Operationalization; Vulnerability (computing); Harm; Expansive; Critical security studies; Security studies; Human development (humanity); Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer security; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law; Network security policy; Security service; Epistemology; Information security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218152,0.00009481086,0.0001636225,0.00002407953,0.002845902,0.00006788205,0.0001489305,0.0001778479,0.00004019755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003907143,0.00009704432,0.0001064986,0.0003791966,0.0007369727,0.0002432407,0.00005296047,0.0002294155,0.000005675629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001398952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003906802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03632481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005447018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998587,0.0002733948,0.0001857012,0.0002320169,0.0002941242,0.000427722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999341,0.0001217982,0.00005740295,0.0001356673,0.00007905176,0.0002650869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001011958,0.00006328507,0.003301121,0.00002285549,0.00001076686,3.531095e-7,0.2366001,3.744473e-7,0.000005363311,0.7527838,0.006717819,0.0004931102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005818747,0.00003726599,0.01536216,0.00001094739,0.00000750436,0.000009109939,0.03260152,0.0001603691,0.000007336836,0.07066368,0.8802644,0.0002938327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7263315,0.0002118314,0.0001661119,0.008579249,0.00005248154,0.0002571201,0.00001807295,0.0001409942,0.2642426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934531,0.0005655744,0.0002922187,0.004328875,0.0007516888,0.00001342263,0.00001184014,0.000005606569,0.0005777102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07277011939852521,"score_gpt":0.3721142051943128,"score_spread":0.2993440857957876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}