{"id":"W1995241482","doi":"10.1007/s004420000620","title":"Spatial isolation and fish communities in drainage lakes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; University of Toronto","keywords":"Habitat; Abiotic component; Ecology; Community structure; Watershed; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Scale (ratio); Cyprinidae; Drainage basin; Ordination; Ecoregion; Fishery; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004109161,0.0001531039,0.000298825,0.001233341,0.00139433,0.0009563699,0.000368651,0.0003072649,0.00172445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002670884,0.000288847,0.0001839178,0.001195019,0.001959629,0.000921377,0.001883214,0.0002391406,0.0001182926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009869603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006349322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03281221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999554,0.0001634785,0.00002778277,0.00007697914,0.0000572598,0.0001204261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986254,0.0003407226,0.0004974713,0.00005742826,0.0001296382,0.0003493784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003548022,0.00005977739,0.9902056,0.00003053215,0.0001078424,0.00009826438,0.003378847,0.0001896825,0.00255602,0.0003436503,0.00006524821,0.002609713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006777439,0.00003404946,0.9968612,0.000004456688,0.00001976144,0.00004547262,0.002452561,0.0001885197,0.00009742052,0.0001729834,0.0001135799,0.000003209732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997477,0.00004608934,0.00001871599,0.00001208911,4.241752e-7,6.80616e-7,0.00001041794,5.049133e-7,0.0001634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998549,0.00002891147,0.00002176613,0.00000453966,0.000001437246,0.000001748253,0.00001752842,7.375201e-7,0.00006829337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03281221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01072844005769345,"score_gpt":0.2134355255611697,"score_spread":0.2027070855034763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}