{"id":"W1995241482","doi":"10.1007/s004420000620","title":"Spatial isolation and fish communities in drainage lakes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; University of Toronto","keywords":"Habitat; Abiotic component; Ecology; Community structure; Watershed; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Scale (ratio); Cyprinidae; Drainage basin; Ordination; Ecoregion; Fishery; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001627486,0.00005414636,0.00007091949,0.0000233663,0.0001428225,0.00000980624,0.00007166846,0.00004233307,0.002487596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002688195,0.00005116989,0.000007290094,0.00005933642,0.0001848791,0.000111659,0.0002156591,0.00006844687,0.00008780335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003744668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.164539e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004586466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2108218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996189,0.0000475648,0.00007557755,0.00008319128,0.00003722752,0.000137507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998097,0.00008030755,0.00002393297,0.00007275424,0.000001370953,0.00001193921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008319457,0.00003211629,0.9876464,0.000002115603,0.00000312011,0.00000900177,0.0004281405,0.00005296286,0.000009475706,0.0001707662,0.009870981,0.00176662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001903067,0.00005960048,0.9842305,0.000001613183,0.000003297816,0.000001270475,0.0005798416,0.0006217936,0.000002122548,0.001291637,0.01295861,0.00005936784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8394486,0.000003201276,0.0001019057,0.001289246,0.00005389806,0.0001011619,8.066914e-7,0.00002260472,0.1589785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968136,0.00008086628,0.0001118762,0.001448074,0.000007757528,0.00002127882,0.000005275506,0.000002388985,0.001508863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2103632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01072844005769345,"score_gpt":0.2134355255611697,"score_spread":0.2027070855034763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}