{"id":"W1995356680","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2008.06.007","title":"Extra! Extra! Some positive technology shocks are expansionary!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shock (circulatory); Economics; Technology shock; Total factor productivity; Measure (data warehouse); Technological change; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Productivity; Monetary policy; Computer science; Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium; Internal medicine; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003383999,0.0003728573,0.0007626654,0.0006388136,0.0003433642,0.00005060563,0.0005263132,0.0002626457,0.000392896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006536339,0.0005086281,0.000240982,0.0001841435,0.0003581679,0.0008592297,0.0001441753,0.0004259901,0.002259852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003265639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004346017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008218556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002292382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972891,0.00001978501,0.0008709471,0.001106449,0.00002041265,0.0006932777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983208,0.00007608082,0.0006037633,0.0007970918,0.00002089011,0.0001813363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001107422,0.0003076971,0.5994695,0.00003772808,0.0003118062,0.0001546777,0.0009923176,0.0009665653,0.001218693,0.3754914,0.0192845,0.001654349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005180618,0.0003884037,0.4760588,0.00007776244,0.00004354688,0.001080197,0.0005941198,0.003181078,0.01025473,0.3207469,0.1774629,0.00493088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670352,0.001789844,0.0006729374,0.02231802,0.001280529,0.0003025463,0.0002790634,0.0001494481,0.006172409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990887,0.000664852,0.001326559,0.005498817,0.0006217932,0.00006016671,0.00003851447,0.00007343728,0.0008288944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1581784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0227586714322154,"score_gpt":0.1827102995999993,"score_spread":0.1599516281677839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}