{"id":"W1995438272","doi":"10.1118/1.1997775","title":"SU‐FF‐T‐104: Rotating Aperture Optimization — Planning and Delivery Characteristics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Collimator; Aperture (computer memory); Rotation (mathematics); Fluence; Optics; Dosimetry; Monte Carlo method; Beam (structure); Quality assurance; Linear particle accelerator; Radiation treatment planning; Nuclear medicine; Physics; Computer science; Mathematics; Radiation therapy; Medicine; Computer vision; Acoustics; Statistics; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007494853,0.0005002429,0.000275069,0.0004160257,0.0001112882,0.0004562633,0.0005310367,0.0003751103,0.002523051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00245631,0.0002446938,0.0003097275,0.0005652991,0.0001710108,0.0003914551,0.0001804281,0.0003206781,0.0008296362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005942035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003978435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001177014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001289053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996383,0.00006910536,0.00002220379,0.00005109656,0.0001984979,0.00002081201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992183,0.0002815809,0.0001554301,0.0001039791,0.0002059453,0.00003473995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001322958,0.0001649704,0.01327457,0.0004490806,0.0001298462,0.0001726122,0.0001157941,0.1518739,0.3085942,0.003324444,0.006750627,0.513827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008484139,0.000978019,0.01928906,0.00001974983,0.00007834484,0.001245143,0.00001155444,0.7276343,0.238237,0.0006179661,0.01173401,0.00007006798],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1493813,0.002191299,0.829698,0.0002418452,0.00004974663,0.0001525243,0.0004862385,0.00520931,0.01258969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221367,0.0004417743,0.4678772,0.0001301748,0.00003573044,0.0001512405,0.001442358,0.001509289,0.006275542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002523051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008440495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009011694570977762,"score_gpt":0.2655883635856304,"score_spread":0.2565766690146526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}