{"id":"W1995547912","doi":"10.1139/x02-164","title":"Estimating impacts of resource management policies in the Foothills Model Forest","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Foothills; Visitor pattern; Economics; Economic impact analysis; Natural resource economics; Policy analysis; Scale (ratio); Resource (disambiguation); Forest management; Economic model; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Geography; Macroeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009165652,0.0004822998,0.0003764207,0.0008194509,0.0004419633,0.0008926266,0.0006666082,0.0005477593,0.001005311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002693634,0.0002232411,0.0003773218,0.0009717298,0.0005917656,0.0005517203,0.0005471996,0.0004773028,0.00005678118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003356842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6529436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5880976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997253,0.000101109,0.000006210546,0.00002576528,0.00005019513,0.00009140772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991635,0.000564305,0.00008620228,0.00003410135,0.00009425191,0.00005765786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002225195,0.00008275985,0.02288352,0.00002294415,0.00002741772,0.000077574,0.00002293674,0.9682292,0.0002866922,0.002281692,0.0003197965,0.005543015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006962493,0.0001155809,0.02199463,0.000006779109,0.00003571698,0.000019944,0.0002791664,0.9733088,0.0004305146,0.003099504,0.0006232907,0.00001639893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929888,0.0001362544,0.004034744,0.0001327537,0.000005605243,0.00003706283,0.0003665213,0.00005257161,0.002245834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965684,0.0001133103,0.002475749,0.00001238714,0.000002548216,0.00001002193,0.0002914004,0.000003948155,0.000522193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3470564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6982005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1692236293089014,"score_gpt":0.2945025679472876,"score_spread":0.1252789386383862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}