{"id":"W1995547912","doi":"10.1139/x02-164","title":"Estimating impacts of resource management policies in the Foothills Model Forest","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Foothills; Visitor pattern; Economics; Economic impact analysis; Natural resource economics; Policy analysis; Scale (ratio); Resource (disambiguation); Forest management; Economic model; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Geography; Macroeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004322527,0.00007327669,0.0001941306,0.0007224143,0.00012603,0.00006217415,0.000366277,0.00005031982,0.00007467662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002900492,0.0000663331,0.00007093931,0.0002575323,0.0001568996,0.0001615934,0.00001568493,0.0002804387,0.00002824842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003747384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001564403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005699749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03218095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987504,0.00006855703,0.0005853947,0.0001114663,0.00008997498,0.0003941824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992341,0.0001014461,0.000242551,0.0002138058,0.00002672026,0.0001814087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003510693,0.00001663443,0.7306381,0.00002111581,0.00001531008,0.00001177182,0.001325832,0.07971386,0.000001013853,0.1869632,0.001107018,0.0001826614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004987872,0.0001274275,0.8722665,0.00007276369,0.000003453533,0.00002723183,0.001522392,0.009961432,0.00001207629,0.1120684,0.003343228,0.00009627049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546611,0.0007071103,0.0006461637,0.0006053628,0.00004756681,0.0001609662,0.00001615344,6.055292e-7,0.043155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980609,0.00004828391,0.001540615,0.00009027968,0.0000334931,0.000005256806,0.000002038567,0.00001164458,0.0002074982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1692236293089014,"score_gpt":0.2945025679472876,"score_spread":0.1252789386383862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}