{"id":"W1995564093","doi":"10.1016/j.jmedhist.2007.01.001","title":"<i>Contra damnationis filios</i>: the Visconti in fourteenth-century papal diplomacy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medieval History","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schism; Diplomacy; Politics; Historiography; Ancient history; Holy See; Alliance; Scrutiny; History; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology; Theology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409783,0.0001955089,0.0003705628,0.000396029,0.0002067899,0.00004568084,0.0004185556,0.00008628963,0.001950536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002230612,0.0001310357,0.0002542713,0.00004974804,0.0004923588,0.0005205419,0.00002671351,0.000813891,0.00003850094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007622758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002530296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003809104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009832763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976726,0.0001375416,0.0009026416,0.0001534462,0.0007817398,0.0003520384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0003486797,0.0005718087,0.0002173158,0.0003311808,0.000175355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001179838,0.0006577563,0.0003529564,0.0001309649,0.000208745,0.0008894418,0.2702969,0.000005121584,0.002098067,0.1588848,0.5474796,0.01781574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00106906,0.0001802713,0.001044896,0.0001058849,0.00006703344,0.00004547089,0.002632696,0.000005704229,0.00002405483,0.0003796516,0.9942915,0.0001537367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1265361,0.1696882,0.0001529696,0.003176152,0.03432225,0.0005506972,0.00002291184,0.00006466122,0.6654861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778749,0.00064883,0.0000855023,0.002882427,0.007242353,0.000003734719,0.000005595497,0.00003608588,0.01122051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8513389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02011771292724013,"score_gpt":0.2269717170966702,"score_spread":0.2068540041694301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}