{"id":"W1995566852","doi":"10.1007/s12065-011-0065-0","title":"Evolutionary computation as an artificial attacker: generating evasion attacks for detector vulnerability testing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Intelligence","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Carleton University","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Computer science; Evasion (ethics); Intrusion detection system; Vulnerability (computing); Detector; Black box; Computer security; Frame (networking); Anomaly detection; White box; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Computer network; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008999021,0.0003077842,0.000252065,0.0002017544,0.001272545,0.0001126304,0.0007896987,0.0002118879,0.0001315822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007075614,0.0003293607,0.0001446807,0.0008621854,0.0001742593,0.001787978,0.0002538906,0.0003458811,0.0001827831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002772707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002466535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002295689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005430563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968117,0.0003294538,0.0007921042,0.001013652,0.0005038696,0.0005492024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975801,0.0004927095,0.0002974118,0.0006032169,0.0008005442,0.0002260816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000575762,0.001944519,0.004463352,0.0001540951,0.00007538378,0.00003070872,0.00595179,0.07519783,0.02650872,0.1161893,0.002381358,0.7665272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008273968,0.0009148697,0.00444452,0.00004456443,0.0000109686,0.00006747008,0.0001165754,0.8757448,0.01024495,0.1075507,0.0003864595,0.0003914714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2426009,0.0001959227,0.754467,0.00008367591,0.001241457,0.0005565897,0.00001030094,0.0004357088,0.0004084062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7022207,0.000008697322,0.2969158,0.0001455834,0.0005273555,0.0001069442,0.00002874342,0.00001762133,0.00002853731],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8005469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1082917580730283,"score_gpt":0.3183179606629741,"score_spread":0.2100262025899458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}