{"id":"W1995624155","doi":"10.1007/s10592-012-0391-5","title":"A conceptual framework for the spatial analysis of landscape genetic data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Metapopulation; Spatial analysis; Population; Landscape connectivity; Landscape ecology; Local adaptation; Ecology; Population genetics; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002165042,0.00009188733,0.0001371138,0.00004144351,0.0001006438,0.00001544609,0.0003676723,0.0001046844,0.00006087267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001989418,0.00007285347,0.00008205646,0.0001550537,0.0001054869,0.000002375211,0.0001634158,0.00003617675,0.000002152319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001682719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004441665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003326848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003823424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.00003302248,0.0001931281,0.0001831004,0.0001138667,0.0001782859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.0001350068,0.0001247947,0.0005893243,0.0001168828,0.00005352003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000926451,0.00009582998,0.9617668,0.00001871401,0.001317743,1.410614e-7,0.0003958689,0.001629528,0.01233039,0.001602944,0.01596762,0.004781761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033359,0.0001513491,0.7930392,0.000007513831,0.001556042,0.000001938058,0.000752974,0.0200167,0.00445684,0.00009178743,0.1793099,0.0002123622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7398846,0.0034991,0.2554631,0.0002280753,0.0002027857,0.0001683473,0.0004774045,0.000004741765,0.00007183002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848154,0.0004474213,0.01302389,0.0005538806,0.0003060464,0.000007866825,0.0007304177,0.000006989377,0.0001081144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2449308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2970878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06789191807096329,"score_gpt":0.2968211141197939,"score_spread":0.2289291960488306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}